How the Red Flags Rule Will Affect Your Practice, Your Patients and What You Can
do to Protect Yourself
In late 2007, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) put
forth a set of regulations known as the Red Flags Rule. This new rule
requires certain entities, including physician practices to develop and
implement policies and procedures to protect consumers against the growing
problem of identity theft. The rule was to go into effect on May 1st, 2009,
but the FTC has delayed enforcement until August 1st, 2009.
The main concern within physician practices is medical
identity theft. In the majority of cases, physician practices have information
such as a person’s name, Social Security number, credit card number and
insurance data readily available and easily accessible to many people. Medical
identity theft occurs when someone uses another person’s name and other
information to obtain and/or make false claims to receive medical treatment,
services, or goods. Probably the most serious outcome in situations of medical
identity theft is that of erroneous or fake information in a patient’s medical
history and records.
The FTC views physician practices as “creditors” since in
essence; patients are extended credit. Credit, in a physician practice is
“acquirable” and “extended” by allowing deferred payment until services are
rendered and insurance is collected. The American Medical Association has been
very active in saying that they disagree with the FTC’s interpretation of
physician practices being viewed as creditors and is fighting to render the
application of the Red Flags Rule null and void for physician practices.
However, as of now the AMA has not won that argument and the FTC Red Flags Rule
is still going forward on August 1st. Physician practices that accept insurance
or have payment plans available for their patients must implement internal
policies and procedures by August 1st, 2009 or face a penalty of up to $2,500
per known violation.
The new FTC rule may be initially confused with HIPPA
regulations, but differs from it because the Red Flags Rule is geared towards
the protection of credit card information, Social Security numbers, Tax
Identification Numbers, business and employer ID numbers. HIPPA, on the other
hand, is intended to protect personal health information.
According to the FTC, Red Flags are patterns, practices,
or specific account activities that hint at the possibility of identity theft.
Some examples of red flags are alerts, notifications or warnings from consumer
reporting agencies, suspicious documents such as inconsistent personal
identification documentation, non-existent and social security numbers.
The FTC will require that all entities have reasonable
policies and procedures in place to detect and respond to possible identity
theft. The documentation that will need to be developed and implemented within
your own practice will have to be relative to the possibility of identity theft
occurring in your office. The easier it could be to potentially “steal” a
patients’ identity in your office the stricter the policy should be. In addition
your Red Flags Rule documentation should be consistent with the existing HIPPA
procedure already in place at your practice.
For sample practice policies please log onto
www.ama-assn.org. These policies can be adapted to best fit the needs of your
practice. The August1st deadline is quickly approaching and unless the FTC
changes its views before then, the Red Flags Rule will apply broadly to the
healthcare industry.
|back to top|
| |